Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 00:03
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
When you visit a store, do you go to shop or buy?
What’s next?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Astronomers Have Detected a Galaxy Millions of Years Older Than Any Previously Observed - WIRED
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What is the difference between anxiety and depressive neurosis?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
The Tyrese Haliburton Conundrum - The Ringer
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Thank you.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
When did women stop wearing bonnets in North America?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Why does my crush make me jealous about having a girlfriend?